Vimazi Clinical

Vimazi Bio-Logic — Clinical Reference
Vimazi Bio-Logic  ·  Clinical Reference — Cover

More Than a Shoe:
A Solution

Vimazi footwear as a mechanical tool within patient load management

GAIT & LOAD MANAGEMENT CLINICAL REFERENCE
FOR CLINICIAN USE  ·  PODIATRY / PHYSIOTHERAPY / SPORTS MEDICINE
OVERVIEW

Three lenses, one mechanism

Whatever your clinical entry point, footwear geometry sits underneath it — quietly supporting or undermining the work you're already doing.

01 — FOOTWEAR & ORTHOSES

Assessment & prescription

You assess gait and prescribe shoes and orthoses to manage load. Here's how footwear geometry either supports or undermines that work.

02 — REHABILITATION

Tissue tolerance training

You train tissue to tolerate load between sessions. Here's how the shoe a patient wears the rest of the time affects that training.

03 — SKELETAL & MECHANICAL FUNCTION

The kinetic chain

Load entering at the foot travels up the kinetic chain. Here's how footwear geometry changes what reaches the joints and spine above.

This reference walks through the mechanical reasoning, the tissue-level evidence, and the specific Vimazi design features that follow from it — so the case for footwear as a clinical tool stands on its own, independent of any single product claim.

THE PROBLEM

Rate of loading, not just amount

Most footwear conversations focus on cushioning and "shock absorption." But tissue load during gait is driven as much by how quickly force and acceleration change as by how much force there is.

Two terms are useful: yank (rate of change of force) and jerk (rate of change of acceleration).

TOE-PHASE % STANCE PHASE FORCE peak reached inside low-tension window gradual arrival (low yank)
Fig. 1 — Two ways to reach the same peak force. The pink curve arrives abruptly, spiking while the tendon is still in its low-tension "toe phase" — leaving little margin before elastic fibres are stretched past tolerance.

A tendon under low tension (its "toe phase") is more elastic but also more vulnerable — a rapid force spike arriving during that brief low-tension window leaves less margin before delicate elastic fibres are stretched past tolerance. This is a plausible mechanical contributor to microtrauma, and is consistent with how clinicians already train tissue to tolerate rapid loading through isometric, concentric, and plyometric work.

SHOE MECHANICS

Where the shoe comes in

A shoe is the only engineered interface between the foot and the ground. Its geometry can either smooth a loading transition or sharpen it. Four mechanical levers matter.

1 2 ~3× BW HEEL CURVE FOREFOOT DENSITY
Fig. 2 — Two of the four mechanical levers, shown in sagittal profile.
1
SAGITTAL PLANE

Heel curve & contact geometry

A smoother heel-to-forefoot transition reduces the abruptness of the heel pivot stopping as the forefoot lands — slowing the rate at which load reaches the Achilles and plantar fascia.

2
FRONTAL PLANE

Forefoot density

At mid-stance, the forefoot can bear up to roughly 3× body weight. A forefoot that's too soft compresses asymmetrically, exaggerating ankle eversion and the rotational torque transmitted to the knee — arriving at a point in the gait cycle where the knee ligaments are in a potentially vulnerable transition.

SHOE MECHANICS

Two more levers

3
VERTICAL PLANE

Heel cushioning

Soft heel material's main benefit isn't energy absorption (foam dissipates relatively little energy) — it's attenuation, extending the duration of impact and thereby reducing the rate of force change reaching the lower back, hips, and knees.

TIME firm heel — sharp rate soft heel — same peak, slower rate
Fig. 3 — Attenuation widens the impulse without necessarily lowering the peak — it's the rate of rise that drops.
4
FORWARD PROGRESSION

Rocker sole

Assists the transition through stance, particularly relevant for patients with forefoot pathology where loading that joint directly is the problem being avoided — rocker-sole footwear has been shown to reduce pressure beneath the metatarsophalangeal joints in patients with 1st MTPJ osteoarthritis (Menz et al., 2016).

The mismatch in most footwear: a single-density midsole can't be optimised for both jobs at once. Soft enough to cushion heel strike usually means too soft to stabilise propulsion, and vice versa — like wanting to land on sand but push off grass.

CASE STUDY

Medial tibial stress syndrome

In-shoe plantar pressure data from a runner with MTSS, comparing their own running shoe against the Vimazi Z60.

Force-time curve comparison, own shoe vs Z60
FORCE-TIME CURVES — OWN SHOE (TOP) VS Z60 (BOTTOM)
Plantar pressure distribution, own shoe vs Z60
PLANTAR PRESSURE MAPS — OWN SHOE (TOP) VS Z60 (BOTTOM)

In their own shoe, the force-time curve (green) rises steeply to an early peak, with the forefoot already loaded early in stance and pressure moving toward the 1st MTPJ and medial forefoot — a fast, medially-biased pattern.

In the Z60, the same curve rises more gradually to a comparable peak, with a less medially concentrated pressure distribution.

This demonstrates how the features of the Vimazi footwear can help to mitigate the forces acting on the lower limb.

THE EVIDENCE BASE

1. Normal physiological loading

How tissue responds to load — and how that connects to footwear design

Tendon: the "toe-phase" buffer

Unloaded tendon collagen has a wavy "crimp" structure that straightens under initial strain, giving a low-stiffness, elastic "toe-phase" that absorbs the rapid initial spike of ground reaction force before the tendon stiffens to bear load (Viidik, 1973; Franchi et al., 2007).

CRIMPED (unloaded) STRAIGHTENED (loaded)
toe stiff region STRAIN → STRESS
Fig. 4 — Crimped collagen straightens under initial strain (left), producing a shallow "toe" region on the stress–strain curve before the tendon stiffens (right).

Cartilage: the hydraulic shield

Cartilage shares compressive load through a biphasic structure — a fluid phase and a solid collagen-proteoglycan matrix. Rapid loading pressurises the trapped fluid, which bears much of the initial force and shields the solid matrix from direct compression (Ateshian et al., 1994; Mow et al., 1980).

LOAD fluid pressurised
Fig. 5 — Trapped fluid (pink) within the collagen–proteoglycan mesh pressurises under rapid load, absorbing force before it reaches the solid matrix.
THE EVIDENCE BASE

2. What changes in tissue degradation

Yank and jerk are distinct loading variables

Yank is the rate of change of force; jerk is the rate of change of acceleration (Lin, Blum & Ting, 2019). Both describe how abruptly a load arrives, independent of its peak size. Tissue also has a critical strain limit — a threshold of deformation beyond which it is damaged (Fung, 1993). Loading rate matters because tissue stiffens under fast loading, so a fast-arriving force can reach that limit sooner than the same peak force arriving gradually (Shearer et al., 2020).

Tendon: yank can bypass the toe-phase buffer

toe-phase high yank — toe-phase skipped, stress hits collagen fibres directly STRAIN →
Fig. 6 — Explosive loading (dashed) cuts straight through the protective toe-phase.

When force is applied explosively (high yank), the tendon's internal fluid matrix has insufficient time to redistribute, so the tissue behaves as abruptly stiff — the protective toe-phase is effectively skipped, and stress concentrates directly on the collagen fibres rather than being absorbed gradually.

Tendon: jerk can outpace muscle-tendon coordination

GTO sensor Muscle stiffness reflex feedback jerk — may arrive faster than loop can respond uneven fibre loading
Fig. 7 — Golgi tendon organ feedback normally smooths muscle stiffness; a sufficiently high jerk can outrun that loop.

Muscle stiffness is partly regulated by reflex feedback from tension-sensing receptors in the tendon (Golgi tendon organs), which help the nervous system adjust muscle stiffness smoothly as load changes. A sufficiently high jerk — an abrupt change in acceleration — may arrive faster than this feedback loop can respond, leaving some fibres briefly over-stretched while neighbouring fibres remain slack — a plausible mechanism for the uneven loading thought to contribute to tendinopathy, which is itself increasingly understood as a degenerative continuum rather than a simple inflammatory event (Cook & Purdam, 2009).

THE EVIDENCE BASE

Cartilage: surface damage removes the hydraulic shield

INTACT SURFACE — low permeability FIBRILLATED — fluid escapes, matrix bears impact
Fig. 8 — Once the superficial layer fibrillates, fluid escapes rather than pressurising, and the solid matrix takes the impact directly.

Repetitive shear or rapid loading can cause microscopic fibrillation of cartilage's superficial layer, sharply increasing its permeability (Buckwalter & Mankin, 1998). Once that layer is compromised, fluid escapes too quickly under load, the protective fluid pressure is lost, and the solid matrix is forced to bear impact directly — a process accelerated by high loading rate (Setton et al., 1993; Ewers et al., 2001).

Across both tissue types, the pattern repeats: the buffer that protects tissue at normal loading rates is exactly what a high yank or high jerk can bypass or damage. That's the mechanical thread connecting cushioning geometry to tissue-level outcomes.

REHAB FIT

3. Rehabilitation & remodelling

Heavy Slow Resistance (HSR): high strain, low rate

A widely used tendinopathy rehabilitation protocol loads tendon with high external resistance at a deliberately slow tempo (e.g. a 3-second concentric and 3-second eccentric phase). The slow tempo keeps both jerk and yank low while still providing enough mechanical strain to stimulate tenocyte remodelling (Kongsgaard et al., 2009) — demonstrating that tissue can be loaded heavily and still remodel favourably, provided the rate of loading stays low.

TIME STRAIN fast / plyometric HSR — 3s : 3s tempo same peak strain, very different rate
Fig. 9 — Both paths can reach the same peak strain; HSR gets there slowly enough to keep yank and jerk low.

Where footwear fits

Clinicians already use slow, controlled tempo to manage jerk and yank within a rehab session. A shoe that smooths the loading transition applies the same principle passively, on every step taken outside the clinic — not as a replacement for HSR or other rehab work, but as a way of keeping everyday loading rate lower while that work is ongoing.

BY DESIGN

By design feature

Clothoid heel curve

FIXED-RADIUS ARC — kink at each end CLOTHOID — curvature changes smoothly
Fig. 10 — The same curve type used in road and railway transition curves and roller-coaster track, chosen precisely because it removes sudden changes in curvature.

Research on rounded running-shoe heel shapes has found reduced peak vertical ground reaction force compared with a standard heel, without materially altering ankle inversion-eversion range of motion (Ryu et al., 2021). Vimazi shoes use a particular type of curve common in engineering, called a clothoid — a curve whose curvature changes smoothly and continuously along its length (i.e. no fixed radius).

Soft rearfoot, firm forefoot (dual-density midsole)

SOFT — shock attenuation FIRM — propulsive stability REARFOOT FOREFOOT
Fig. 11 — One density cannot do both jobs; two densities can.

Extending the time over which force is absorbed reduces peak loading rate (Ewers et al., 2001), and loading rate is implicated in where cartilage damage occurs under rapid compression (Párraga Quiroga et al., 2017). A single midsole density cannot simultaneously optimise for shock attenuation (compliance) and propulsive stability (firmness).

Rocker sole

By shifting the effective pivot point of the step forward, a rocker geometry reduces the dorsiflexion required at the metatarsophalangeal joints during push-off. In patients with 1st MTPJ osteoarthritis, rocker-sole footwear has been shown to reduce pressure beneath the joint during gait (Menz et al., 2016). Minimising angular jerk at the knee is a related clinical goal: prolonged walking under heavy load has been shown to increase the cost of angular jerk at the knee by up to 110% in the sagittal plane and 51% in the frontal plane (Krammer et al., 2021), and patients with severe knee osteoarthritis show significantly greater frontal-plane angular jerk during mid-stance than those with early-stage disease, even though overall movement smoothness does not differ between the two groups (Fukaya et al., 2018). Direct evidence that rocker or plate geometry itself lowers loading rate or joint shear stress remains limited.

CLINICAL FIT

Where this fits clinically

This is not a replacement for orthoses, rehab, or manual therapy — it's the environment those interventions operate within. An orthotic is only as effective as the shoe it sits inside; rehab gains made in clinic are tested with every step a patient takes outside of clinic.

Vimazi is positioned as a tool that extends clinical load management into daily life, not a retail add-on.

See the references on the following page.

REFERENCES

Works cited

Every citation referenced throughout this reference, listed alphabetically by first author.

01Ateshian, G.A., Lai, W.M., Zhu, W.B. & Mow, V.C. (1994) — cited for cartilage's biphasic fluid–solid load sharing.
02Buckwalter, J.A. & Mankin, H.J. (1998) — cited for cartilage superficial-layer fibrillation and permeability.
03Cook, J.L. & Purdam, C.R. (2009) — cited for tendinopathy as a degenerative continuum.
04Ewers, B.J., Dvoracek-Driksna, D., Orth, M.W. & Haut, R.C. (2001) — cited for impact duration, attenuation, and loading-rate effects on cartilage.
05Franchi, M. et al. (2007) — cited for tendon collagen crimp structure and the toe-phase.
06Fukaya, T. et al. (2018) — cited for frontal-plane angular jerk at the knee across knee osteoarthritis severity.
07Fung, Y.C. (1993) — cited for tissue critical strain limits and deformation thresholds.
08Kongsgaard, M. et al. (2009) — cited for Heavy Slow Resistance tendinopathy rehabilitation and tenocyte remodelling.
09Krammer, C. et al. (2021) — cited for angular jerk cost at the knee under prolonged loaded walking.
10Lin, T., Blum, K.P. & Ting, L.H. (2019) — cited for the definitions of yank and jerk as loading variables.
11Menz, H.B. et al. (2016) — cited for rocker-sole footwear reducing metatarsophalangeal pressure in 1st MTPJ osteoarthritis.
12Mow, V.C., Kuei, S.C., Lai, W.M. & Armstrong, C.G. (1980) — cited for the biphasic model of cartilage compressive behaviour.
13Párraga Quiroga, J.M. et al. (2017) — cited for loading rate and the location of cartilage damage under rapid compression.
14Ryu, J. et al. (2021) — cited for rounded running-shoe heel shapes reducing peak vertical ground reaction force.
15Setton, L.A., Zhu, W. & Mow, V.C. (1993) — cited for permeability changes following cartilage surface damage.
16Shearer, T. et al. (2020) — cited for tissue stiffening under fast loading and rate-dependent strain-limit effects.
17Viidik, A. (1973) — cited for the crimped collagen structure underlying the tendon toe-phase.

Citations are given in the short author–year form used throughout this reference. Full bibliographic details (journal, volume, pages) are available from Vimazi on request.

01 / 12
Use ← → or swipe to turn pages · click a tab to jump to a section